Feedback Forum
- This topic has 10,047 replies, 724 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by
micpri53.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 7, 2020 at 9:27 am #15468
David Goldberg
Edge Studio StaffHi! Upload your recordings, and get feedback from your peers!
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 months, 2 weeks ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 months, 2 weeks ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 months, 2 weeks ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 months, 2 weeks ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
November 4, 2023 at 1:58 pm #91336
ierxyzz
ParticipantHi all, uploading these 2 reads before my upcoming coaching session. This is my first time using the De-Clicker tool, and I think it went well. Thanks in advance for any feedback!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:11 pm #91443
Alexander Wright
ParticipantHello there, ‘
The freshii bit was clean. i think it flowed really well start to finish. The risewell had different tones or levels to it. It did sound a little choppy in the middle. The recording quality is excellent…sounds clean.
-
-
November 4, 2023 at 11:12 am #91329
Joseph Thompson
ParticipantHi there, and thanks for taking the time to give me some feedback. I’m working on pacing, flow, and enunciation, so I’d appreciate any constructive criticism that’ll help me improve my technique. Thanks in advance.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:21 pm #91444
Alexander Wright
Participantin terms of pacing, the story-teller was slower than the medical script, maybe the pause in between sentences could be a little shorter, but the flow was consistent. THe medical script was a livelier tone and was definitely faster. “Access your patient records”…Access came out a little higher pitched, otherwise, the tone was consistent throughout. Hope that makes sense.
-
November 4, 2023 at 2:10 pm #91339
ierxyzz
ParticipantI like your flow! And I can understand your enunciation well. For Medical-script, “patient records and appointments” ran together a little bit for me. Maybe either slowing that part down a hair or changing the pitch a little more between them would help me process the information better. Great stuff!
-
-
November 2, 2023 at 9:08 am #91281
Barndi
ParticipantHello everyone! Trying out the recording studio (hope the sound quality is up to s***f) and rerecorded PURINA based on the feedback to be brighter and peppier. Not sure if enough. Also uploading BIG CATS as a way different read. Would appreciate any and all feedback – thank you!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:26 pm #91445
Alexander Wright
ParticipantI liked the Purina recording, especially the end. You can hear the smile. :). The only thing i noticed were inhales…I have some difficulty figuring out when to breathe during a read. Lol.
-
-
November 1, 2023 at 6:45 pm #91261
Stephen Winburn
ParticipantHi all,
I’ve finally gotten around to doing the homework for my next coaching session! I decided to do the same script twice rather than two different ones; one focusing on being conversational at what i feel is a natural pace, and the other focusing on pace and tone specifically.
My usual headset was on the fritz today so please excuse the sound quality in the recordings! Thank you in advance!EDIT: I accidentally uploaded it 3 different times and can’t remove them🙃 just the first two files friends, apologies!
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Stephen Winburn. Reason: wrong file type
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Stephen Winburn. Reason: wrong file type
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Stephen Winburn. Reason: wrong file type
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Stephen Winburn.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:35 pm #91448
Alexander Wright
ParticipantI liked the recording quality of fish part 2 better than part 1. To me part 1 sounded a little muffled and part 2 was a brighter tone. The flow was good in both recordings. Part2 did pick up more sound and towards the end it wasn’t as clear as the part 1.
-
November 2, 2023 at 8:57 am #91278
Barndi
ParticipantI thought the pacing was great on all of them. Tone wise, and I don’t know if this is bc of the recording quality, but I like FISH-part-1.mp3 the best. It sounded more authentic than FISH-part-2.mp3 and other recordings like it. Hope this helps!
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
-
October 31, 2023 at 11:48 pm #91241
Earthbul
ParticipantThoughts and critiques welcomed.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 2, 2023 at 8:59 am #91279
Barndi
ParticipantWow! That sounded like something i would hear on the radio today! The very first time I heard it, I didn’t catch the first two words but the second time heard it no problem. Hope this helps!
-
November 1, 2023 at 7:08 pm #91272
Earthbul
ParticipantFelt like you were rushing a bit and a little too precise with your words, if that makes any sense. I’m not good at expressing myself withe written word lol Just slow down a bit and speak naturally. I like your voice.
-
-
October 31, 2023 at 11:40 pm #91239
-
October 31, 2023 at 8:45 am #91203
Emily Gauthier
ParticipantGood Morning! Happy Halloween everyone!
I recorded both of these in my closet for now, hoping to get some better equipment next year. Aside from sound quality of the home studio, please let me know what I can improve on! Thank you!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
October 31, 2023 at 11:12 pm #91238
Earthbul
ParticipantI feel you on sound quality. I recently moved and my acoustics are for s**t at the moment. Thinking of investing in a Hogan box. I like your voice in this. Great delivery with nice pacing. And it’s Excedrin with a short e. I always check pronunciation of the clients name before I record. I mispronounced McAfee during an audition and didn’t hear the end of it. Keep it up, I’d love to hear more from you.
-
October 31, 2023 at 3:51 pm #91227
Angela Doyle
ParticipantExcedrin:
Aside from the mispronunciation (I’m pretty sure it’s pronounced “Ex-CED-rin”), I liked your read. I could totally relate/connect with what you were saying. One nit: I’d add a beat between “go away” and “There is a solution”. I like your tone. Very well-suited to the spot.Carnation:
Add a beat between “change the world around us” and “Packed with protein…” The way it is now (jammed up together a bit) makes me think you’re still talking about changing the world… Again, I like your tone. Well-suited.
-
-
October 30, 2023 at 12:49 pm #91186
Grace Lee
ParticipantPlease disregard the sound quality as this was recorded on my iphone. But any other feedback is appreciated! Thank you!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 2, 2023 at 9:04 am #91280
Barndi
ParticipantI agree with Emily that your voice is very pleasant and calming to listen to and that the pacing was good. It felt like “for the natural world” and the following word “when” should connect more? Or is it a whole new sentence? And I agree that the last sentence could use a bit more urgency or some kind of feeling since this is about saving nature. Hope this helps!
-
October 31, 2023 at 8:54 am #91207
Emily Gauthier
ParticipantHi Grace!
You have a very pleasant voice to listen to! It’s very calm and soothing which can definitely be a great asset. The pace was good and you’re really picking up those T’s at the end.
I would say that it does sound more like you’re reading than conveying a message about the awareness of the environment. The tone stays consistent throughout which is an indicator. I would try to push for more variation in your voice, like picturing the birds in your head near the end, or try digging into a few words. “We *knew* we had to do something.” To give it a bit more power.
Overall, pleasant read!
-
-
October 27, 2023 at 5:33 pm #91119
Brandyhart610
ParticipantMay I have some feedback specific to the sound quality from my home studio?
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
December 1, 2023 at 9:02 am #91992
Declan Waters
ParticipantHi Brandy!
Like the others have said, it’s a bit loud, but scratch-free here – it sounds great, quality-wise. 🙂
-
October 31, 2023 at 8:57 am #91208
Emily Gauthier
ParticipantHi Brandy!
I do agree with James that it is a little loud, but i’m not hearing the scratch. Maybe it’s subtler than I’m anticipating, so I’d get another veteran ear to listen for it!
Otherwise, very solid! Your voice is bright and bubbly and really nice on the ears. Hope to hear more!
-
October 28, 2023 at 3:26 pm #91132
James
ParticipantYour delivery was very good! But for the sound the volume was loud. I am also just guessing, but did you use a noise remover by chance? The noise floor was low as it should be, but I did hear some “scratch” in the audio on my end; perhaps someone can give a listen and make sure it’s not my headphones. I’d be interested to know more about the home studio setup you have if that is ok.
-
-
October 26, 2023 at 4:36 pm #91082
Angela Doyle
ParticipantHi! I’m new to Edge and to this feedback forum. I just started narration coaching sessions with Edge after completing a round of commercial sessions (and demo reel creation) with the competitor. =)
I’d love to get creative feedback (not technical–still working on improving my home studio) on these 2 reads please. My friends and family think my work is solid, but it’d be great to get input from people who are in the industry. Is it smooth? Does my voice grab you right from the start and keep you interested throughout? How could I improve my reads?
Thanks in advance!
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Angela Doyle.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
October 30, 2023 at 12:42 pm #91184
Grace Lee
ParticipantThe American Airlines one could be a little less choppier in the first half and more upbeat to really sound more “happy” to serve the passengers. I like your tone. It’s well suited for this read.
The second Biogenetic one is def better than the first. I have no idea what you were saying but it sounds like you know what you’re talking about. Lol. I like the sound of your voice, pacing and your articulation.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Grace Lee. Reason: Added “than” after the word “better” in second paragraph
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
-
October 28, 2023 at 3:20 pm #91131
James
ParticipantThe biology track (the second posted, didn’t listen to the first) was Ok! Perhaps bring the pace up some, and engage the listener. I was a good track, but I didn’t get the connection. Otherwise the read was good! The airline track had a very good pace and also well read. I have a feeling you will go far in voice over!
-
October 26, 2023 at 4:57 pm #91090
Angela Doyle
ParticipantI can’t seem to delete the Biogenetics Law read and replace it with a better one! Please disregard that one and listen to this one.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.