Feedback Forum
- This topic has 10,053 replies, 728 voices, and was last updated 5 days, 4 hours ago by
JaimeMartinezVO.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 7, 2020 at 9:27 am #15468
David Goldberg
Edge Studio StaffHi! Upload your recordings, and get feedback from your peers!
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 10 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 7 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 7 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 7 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 7 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 7 months ago by
David Goldberg.
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 10 months ago by
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
November 26, 2023 at 4:40 pm #91827
TIm Sullivan
ParticipantHi.
Here are a couple potential audition reads. I’d appreciate some feedback.
The “Thirst” piece is looking for a middle aged masculine, husky voice.
The GNH spot wants a friendly but authoritative voice.
Thanks in advance,
Tim
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 29, 2023 at 9:34 pm #91935
Earthbul
ParticipantI think you hit it out of tbe part on both these reads. Both are very distinct types of reads which you managed to convey to this listener wonderfully.
-
November 27, 2023 at 3:50 pm #91858
Angela Doyle
ParticipantThirst–I was expecting to hear a more lighthearted approach during “you’re not thinking about it at all”–just minding your own business, la dee dah, and then suddenly desperation in “until it’s all you can think about…brain screams…”, and then maybe a change in tone to a more factual one halfway through as you begin to describe the list of effects of dehydration (after a bit more of a pause to emphasize the switch).
GNH–you definitely hit the friendly but authoritative mark!
Nicely done.
-
November 29, 2023 at 10:52 am #91923
TIm Sullivan
ParticipantThank you, Angela.
That’s great feedback. I’ll incorporate it into my read!
-
November 30, 2023 at 12:44 pm #91954
Angela Doyle
ParticipantI’d love to hear an updated version here!
-
-
-
-
November 26, 2023 at 12:40 pm #91815
Frantz
ParticipantHey everyone, first time posting on here! I’m here looking for feedback with my recordings, mainly with diction, speed, and flow as I feel like those are my main issues whenever I play back my stuff. If there’s anything else that you think I can improve on, please let me know. I’m also working on editing my audios as well (making sure its audible and lowering peaks/breaths, etc.), so feedback from that department would also be much appreciated.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 27, 2023 at 3:43 pm #91855
Angela Doyle
ParticipantI usually try not to read other people’s feedback before I post mine, but somehow read Tim’s first, but I totally agree with him on all of his points aside from clicking (I didn’t notice it). I do love the different sounds for the 2!
-
November 26, 2023 at 4:11 pm #91825
TIm Sullivan
ParticipantHi.
I liked the very different tones for the two pieces.
For GrammarlyGo, be careful with the product name. You might want to slow it down to make sure it’s understood (they’d be the ones paying for the spot…). And, I did hear some mouth noise (clicking). I’ve been told hydration will help with that.
I loved the pacing for the Niagara Falls piece. But, be careful with pitch. It felt a little roller coaster-y. Pitch went up and down and up and down. I tend to do this sometimes, too.
Good reads. Good variety!
-
-
November 24, 2023 at 8:29 am #91779
Emily Gauthier
ParticipantHey everyone!
Back again with another couple of samples! I have two from the same read, just wanting to know which people prefer. I think I like 2 overall more, but if you could let me know why which one sounds better than the other i’d appreciate it! Thank you!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 27, 2023 at 3:29 pm #91848
Angela Doyle
ParticipantI like both takes, but I prefer the beginning of take #1 more than #2 because #2 sounds SUPER annoyed. I know it’s supposed to sound annoyed and frustrated, but it turned me off a bit since it was VERY annoyed. There was a bit too much attitude for me, especially “there’s gotta be one near ya”. Aside from that (and that’s just me, of course), nice read!
-
November 26, 2023 at 4:16 pm #91826
TIm Sullivan
ParticipantNice reads. I also preferred #2 – a little more attitude in that one.
I’m not sure if this was a regional spot, if it isn’t be careful with pronunciation. “Fire alarms” really stuck out for this New England boy’s ears.
Also, I did hear a bit of mouth noise (clicking) toward the end of your reads. I know I have trouble with that, too.
-
November 26, 2023 at 1:02 pm #91818
Frantz
ParticipantHey Emily!
First off, I must say that your takes were great! I can definitely picture myself hearing this in the background with the TV on or YouTube playing somewhere. I do like how both of them sound conversational and overall friendly, but I’d say that you have to be careful with the vocalizations scattered throughout both audios. I’ve been told that it’s only natural for us to do so because we’d like to appear like we’re engaging with the listener, but we also have to be conscious about the editing process as well since some people are not a fan of them.
As for my pick on which take sounds better, I’d have to choose 2 as well. Though they both sound very similar to me, I like 2’s flow better, especially with the last part where you’re listing what 7-11 has and when they’re open. Also, I do like the beginning part of 2 with the starving part but the fire alarm situation of 1 sounds better, since both feel like they’re more natural to me. So yes, 2 is overall better, hope this helps!
-
-
November 15, 2023 at 3:00 pm #91611
Angela Doyle
ParticipantHello everyone. Here’s my homework for my next coaching session. I’d love to hear from you specifically as to whether you felt like I connected with you sufficiently. Other feedback (besides technical) is definitely welcome as well! Thank you.
Also, I’d like to hear what adjectives you’d use to describe my voice. Thanks so much!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 26, 2023 at 1:15 pm #91819
Frantz
ParticipantHey Angela! Both of these were great takes! With the meditation audio, I’d say that you have the perfect voice to get into this part of the industry. It’s very comforting and safe, personal and warm. With regard to feeling like you connected with me, I’d say yes to that, 100%.
As for the Chase audio, I can definitely see your voice also fitting into this part of the industry as it’s very calm and in control. I’m not too sure what type of feel you were going for here, but to me, it felt rather impersonal and that it doesn’t have that human feel to it. Maybe a smile can help with that, just something that helps with making it feel like you’re engaging with the listener a bit more.
Hopefully these help! Have a good one!
-
November 27, 2023 at 3:34 pm #91849
Angela Doyle
ParticipantThank you! My coach said the same thing about the Chase read about being a bit impersonal =)
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
Angela Doyle.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
-
-
November 24, 2023 at 8:38 am #91782
Emily Gauthier
ParticipantHi Angela!
The first read was fantastic, I had a double-take as it took me right back to the professional ones i’ve heard over the years! Your voice seems very natural for meditation videos and audio, I would definitely put this as something in your wheelhouse! I would describe your voice here as calm, collected, and reassuring.
Chase IVR was nice, but I feel it needed to be slowed down more. It also felt a bit more robotic, which I understood is for phone service, but it could have used just a slight shift of personal comfort, if that makes sense. Coupled with the faster dialogue it felt more like you were reading the script than trying to make a pleasant experience for the person on the other line. I would describe your voice here as crisp, quick, and just a little samey.
I hope these help!
-
November 27, 2023 at 3:36 pm #91851
Angela Doyle
ParticipantThank you! I REALLY feel like meditation reads are in my wheelhouse, so I’m glad to hear it worked for you! The Chase read–my coach said the same thing about being robotic/not as personal as it could be. =)
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
Angela Doyle.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
-
-
-
November 7, 2023 at 8:28 pm #91446
Alexander Wright
ParticipantTrying out this gardening spot for my demo. It’s one of a couple that i connect with the script some. Anyway, would love to get feedback on tone, speed, pace, and anything you would like to recommend improving. Thank you!!!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 15, 2023 at 3:02 pm #91614
Angela Doyle
ParticipantI feel like a bit more excitement was in order. Your articulation was great, and I like your voice.
-
November 12, 2023 at 10:32 pm #91514
Grace Lee
ParticipantThere seems to be an inconsistency in speed, as if it was sped up in the middle and then slowed down towards the end. I’m not sure if this version was the one you wanted to upload. You have a pleasant voice though~
-
November 13, 2023 at 8:55 pm #91537
Alexander Wright
ParticipantThank you for the feedback!
-
-
-
November 4, 2023 at 1:58 pm #91336
ierxyzz
ParticipantHi all, uploading these 2 reads before my upcoming coaching session. This is my first time using the De-Clicker tool, and I think it went well. Thanks in advance for any feedback!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:11 pm #91443
Alexander Wright
ParticipantHello there, ‘
The freshii bit was clean. i think it flowed really well start to finish. The risewell had different tones or levels to it. It did sound a little choppy in the middle. The recording quality is excellent…sounds clean.
-
-
November 4, 2023 at 11:12 am #91329
Joseph Thompson
ParticipantHi there, and thanks for taking the time to give me some feedback. I’m working on pacing, flow, and enunciation, so I’d appreciate any constructive criticism that’ll help me improve my technique. Thanks in advance.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:21 pm #91444
Alexander Wright
Participantin terms of pacing, the story-teller was slower than the medical script, maybe the pause in between sentences could be a little shorter, but the flow was consistent. THe medical script was a livelier tone and was definitely faster. “Access your patient records”…Access came out a little higher pitched, otherwise, the tone was consistent throughout. Hope that makes sense.
-
November 4, 2023 at 2:10 pm #91339
ierxyzz
ParticipantI like your flow! And I can understand your enunciation well. For Medical-script, “patient records and appointments” ran together a little bit for me. Maybe either slowing that part down a hair or changing the pitch a little more between them would help me process the information better. Great stuff!
-
-
November 2, 2023 at 9:08 am #91281
Barndi
ParticipantHello everyone! Trying out the recording studio (hope the sound quality is up to s***f) and rerecorded PURINA based on the feedback to be brighter and peppier. Not sure if enough. Also uploading BIG CATS as a way different read. Would appreciate any and all feedback – thank you!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:26 pm #91445
Alexander Wright
ParticipantI liked the Purina recording, especially the end. You can hear the smile. :). The only thing i noticed were inhales…I have some difficulty figuring out when to breathe during a read. Lol.
-
-
November 1, 2023 at 6:45 pm #91261
Stephen Winburn
ParticipantHi all,
I’ve finally gotten around to doing the homework for my next coaching session! I decided to do the same script twice rather than two different ones; one focusing on being conversational at what i feel is a natural pace, and the other focusing on pace and tone specifically.
My usual headset was on the fritz today so please excuse the sound quality in the recordings! Thank you in advance!EDIT: I accidentally uploaded it 3 different times and can’t remove them🙃 just the first two files friends, apologies!
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
Stephen Winburn. Reason: wrong file type
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
Stephen Winburn. Reason: wrong file type
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
Stephen Winburn. Reason: wrong file type
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
Stephen Winburn.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 7, 2023 at 8:35 pm #91448
Alexander Wright
ParticipantI liked the recording quality of fish part 2 better than part 1. To me part 1 sounded a little muffled and part 2 was a brighter tone. The flow was good in both recordings. Part2 did pick up more sound and towards the end it wasn’t as clear as the part 1.
-
November 2, 2023 at 8:57 am #91278
Barndi
ParticipantI thought the pacing was great on all of them. Tone wise, and I don’t know if this is bc of the recording quality, but I like FISH-part-1.mp3 the best. It sounded more authentic than FISH-part-2.mp3 and other recordings like it. Hope this helps!
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
-
October 31, 2023 at 11:48 pm #91241
Earthbul
ParticipantThoughts and critiques welcomed.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.-
November 2, 2023 at 8:59 am #91279
Barndi
ParticipantWow! That sounded like something i would hear on the radio today! The very first time I heard it, I didn’t catch the first two words but the second time heard it no problem. Hope this helps!
-
November 1, 2023 at 7:08 pm #91272
Earthbul
ParticipantFelt like you were rushing a bit and a little too precise with your words, if that makes any sense. I’m not good at expressing myself withe written word lol Just slow down a bit and speak naturally. I like your voice.
-
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.