[irvj]

Good read, great tone and pacing and your voice is just right for this copy. I’m probably just nitpicking here but in your 2nd line, maybe shorten the pauses between, maintained, fixed or replaced, so that it flows a little more smoothly. And maybe add a little more weight to “million” in your fourth line. Nice job!

[irvj]

1 & 3 you had more fun with whereas 2 was stiff and slightly choppy. It sounded as if you were reading. But you’re on the right track. Keep it up!

[irvj]

Both were good reads but I prefer #2 as it sounded a bit more natural and conversational.

[irvj]

Thanks for the feedback. I’ll give it another shot and change that pace. Thanks guys!

[irvj]

Hello all!! Trying to get into the promo groove here. I welcome all feedback! Thanks!

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[irvj]

Hi Katelyn! The first read sounded more natural, more you. As others have posted, a really crisp, clean voice. For the more luxurious read, maybe go down a tad in pitch so that it has a more sultry, refined feel to it. Just a thought.

[irvj]

Good job! I like the read, pace and tone were on point. You might have to play with the Audacity settings a bit, sounded as if you were speaking into a can and there was also a bit of sibilance, (which I struggle with). You also might want to remove some breaths either manually or via a noise gate. The read was good, just need to tweak your settings. Keep it up!

[irvj]

Hi, i thought the slightly slower pace on your 2nd recording was a great improvement. The first recording was just a tad rushed. Love your tone and the accessibility of your voice.

[irvj]

You’re on point there. After listening for the umpteenth time, a little more energy would be appropriate. Thanks for your input katelyndawnv!!

[irvj]

Thanks a ton mkell755!!!

[Author]

Replies